Security doesn't need to be hard and with the visual queue of a green address bar we believe we've made it easy." EV SSL Certificates are not the end all solution but we believe they are a giant step in securing the dealership," said Richard Keith Latman, iMagicLab's Chief Executive Officer "Most fraud and data loss occurs at the dealership through old server-based systems and careless data exchanges online. "Over the last three years iMagicLab has been adding security protections and constantly looking for new technologies to safeguard the data we have been entrusted with. For example, if you use Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 and login to iMagicLab's Customer Relationship Management (CRM) tool the URL address bar will turn green to let you know your data is safe to input and that you have a secure connection. Extended Validation SSL Certificates give high security Web browsers information to clearly identify that users are connected to iMagicLab's data centers. Dealers never really know for sure that they are connected to the right server or even if they are connected to their vendor at all. With the proliferation of phishing scams and the easy availability of packet sniffers, any data input to local servers or to online systems has become risky. IMagicLab, the addition of this new military-strength encryption will visually notify each dealership that their secure connection is in place before allowing any data entry. In addition to the many proprietary data protection devices employed by NO sex-offender registration.IMagicLab, the nation's fastest growing Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Internet sales and Inventory software system for automobile dealers, is pleased to announce that it has again enhanced its customer's data security with the addition of new Extended Validation SSL certificates across its extensive platform. This is why at Capovilla & Williams we employ our own investigators to ensure that our clients are given a fair opportunity to defend themselves. The lesson we learned is that our client cannot rely on military law enforcement investigations to get justice. Both of those witnesses denied ever seeing an assault even though they would have been feet away from my client when the alleged assault occurred.Īfter 4 days of trial, the military jury fully acquitted my client. Plus, I spoke to two different witnesses who attended the party where the alleged assault occurred. Ten days later, his girlfriend accused my client of sexual assault. My client immediately reported him, and he faced a misconduct investigation. While on a dive in Key West, Florida, the second accuser’s boyfriend called my client the N-word. The week before she accused my client, my client reported her boyfriend for using a racial slur against him. We felt good about what we had found.Īs for the second accuser, we discovered that she had a motive to falsely accuse our client of assault. We also uncovered text messages exchanged between our client and Accuser One that indicated they were very friendly with one another in the days immediately after the alleged assault. She heard no yelling, no fighting, and otherwise had no knowledge that a fight had occurred. According to the desk log, this witness was still in the office as the alleged assault took place. We also spoke to a witness who was sitting in an office located a few doors down. No scattered papers, no sign of a fight, and the desk was not in disarray. Both witnesses confirmed that the there was no evidence of an assault. We interviewed the person who sat at that desk and the janitor who was scheduled to clean the office that night. As for Accuser One, she claimed that during the assault, she screamed, threw things at my client, and that she was thrown on a desk, causing significant damage to the desk. We immediately began to investigate both allegations. In her allegation, she asserted my client grabbed her breasts and her buttocks without her consent. She claimed that my client assaulted her at a party while everyone else slept. Accuser One claimed that my client attacked her, threw her against a desk, tried to rip her clothes off, and she only got away because she fought my client off.Īccuser Two was dating another diver in my client’s unit. She did not report the allegation for several months, but she made a statement to NCIS, and my client was charged. One accuser worked with my client and one accuser was dating one of the divers in my client’s unit.Īccuser One, the co-worker, claimed that my client waited until everyone in the office left, walked into her office, and essentially attacked her. When I first reviewed the charge sheet, I realized that this was a two-accuser case. My client was an E-6 Navy Diver and one of the first African Americans to graduate from the Navy Diver program. When we were first hired on this case, the assigned military counsel thought that the client should plead guilty.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |